Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
Clin Nephrol ; 95(1): 45-53, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155542

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, a new respiratory disease, named COVID-19, caused by a novel coronavirus, emerged in Wuhan and since then spread rapidly throughout China and worldwide. Hemodialysis patients are an especially vulnerable subgroup of the general population. However, there are only a few reports on the course of COVID-19 in maintenance hemodialysis patients. CASE REPORT: We describe in depth the clinical, analytical, and radiological details of 9 hemodialysis patients from a single center in Madrid (Spain) diagnosed with COVID-19. Furthermore, we describe and discuss the therapeutic aspects and the patients' outcomes. DISCUSSION: We present one of the first case series of chronic hemodialysis patients with COVID-19. Between March 14 and April 8, 2020, out of 76 prevalent patients in our hemodialysis unit, 9 (11.8%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. The most common symptoms were fever (77.8%), asthenia (77.8%), cough (55.6%), and dyspnea (33.3%). A total of 3 patients developed severe pneumonia, whereas 4 patients developed mild pneumonia. In 2 patients, no pathologic changes were found on chest radiography. All patients presented lymphopenia. While 6 (66.7%) patients required hospitalization, none of them was admitted to intensive care unit. The most common treatments used were azithromycin (100%), hydroxychloroquine (66.7%), lopinavir/ritonavir (55.6%) and ß-interferon (22.2%). In general, we observed a mild to moderate severity of disease in our case series. One patient died, however due to a cause not related to COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/patologia , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Espanha
5.
Rev. colomb. nefrol. (En línea) ; 7(2): 123-128, jul.-dic. 2020. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1251573

RESUMO

Resumen La enfermedad por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha aumentado drásticamente desde marzo 2020 y en la actualidad no existen datos suficientes para establecer el riesgo de contagio de este virus en receptores de trasplante renal en comparación con la población general. El objetivo de este reporte de caso fue presentar las características del curso clínico y terapéutico de una paciente trasplantada renal en terapia de mantenimiento que presentó neumonía por COVID-19 y fue atendida en un hospital no trasplantador. La paciente era una mujer de 47 años con antecedente de insuficiencia renal no filiada que recibió trasplante renal de donante por muerte encefálica en el año 2006. Las características clínicas (síntomas, exámenes de laboratorio e imágenes radiológicas) de la mujer fueron similares a las de otros pacientes con COVID-19 de la población general, por lo que fue tratada con hidroxicloroquina, lopinavir/ritonavir, antibioticoterapia profiláctica y dosis única de tocilizumab. La triple terapia inmunosupresora de mantenimiento que recibía se discontinuó al no poder monitorizar los niveles sanguíneos de algunos fármacos inmunosupresores; asimismo se indicaron dosis bajas de metilprednisolona y 5 dosis de flebogama. La neumonía por COVID-19 en esta paciente inmunodeprimida evolucionó favorablemente sin necesidad de respiración mecánica asistida, y la función renal mejoró a sus valores basales, mantenien- do moderada proteinuria. Al alta se reinició la dosis previa de su medicación inmunosupresora habitual. La experiencia descrita en el presente caso puede ser útil para en tratamiento de pacientes trasplantados y con COVID-19 en hospitales no trasplantadores y que no disponen de la capacidad de verificar los niveles de medicación inmunosupresora.


Abstract SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) has dramatically increased since March 2020. There is insufficient data to establish the risk of acquiring the infection in kidney transplant recipients in comparison with the general population. The objective of this case is to report here the clinical features and therapeutic course of the renal transplant recipient with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia in a non-transplant hospital. This is a 47-year-old woman with end stage renal disease (ESRD) of unknown cause who received kidney transplantation 14 years ago. Her clinical characteristics (symptoms, laboratory test results, and chest x-ray images) were similar to those of non-transplanted COVID-19 patients. She was treated with hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, and a single dose of tocilizumab for COVID-19. The triple maintenance immunosuppressive therapy she was receiving was temporarily suspended due to the inability to monitor immunosuppressive drugs levels in our hospital, and low dose methylprednisolone plus five doses of flebogamma were administered instead. The COVID-19 pneumonia in this long-term immunosuppressed patient was successfully recovered without the need to assisted mechanical respiration. The renal function improved to its baseline values, maintaining moderate proteinuria. At discharge, the previous dose of his usual immunosuppressive medication was restarted. We conclude that the experience described with our case may be useful for non-transplant hospitals, which do not have the capacity to perform immunosuppressive medication titration.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transplante de Rim , COVID-19 , Pacientes , Espanha , Terapêutica , Terapia de Imunossupressão
8.
Hemodial Int ; 23(1): 50-57, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30367698

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare molecule removal and albumin leakage in postdilution online hemodiafiltration with different high-flux dialyzers. METHODS: We studied seven high-flux dialyzers (Polyflux 210H®, Evodial 2.2®, FxCordiax1000®, Elisio21H®, TS-2.1SL®, XevontaHi20®, VitaPES 210-HF®) in 6 patients. The reduction ratio (RR) of small- and middle-sized molecules was calculated. Dialysate samples were collected to estimate the albumin leakage. FINDINGS: Global differences between dialyzers were observed in the RR of ß2 microglobulin (P =0.003) and prolactin (P =0.013). The mean loss of albumin in the dialysate per session varied between 114 ± 67 mg (with Evodial 2.2) and 2621 ± 1363 mg per session (with XevontaHi20). We found global differences between dialyzers in total albumin loss (P = 0.05). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that the performance of high-flux dialyzers was different among the types and that not all high-flux dialyzers should be considered equal.


Assuntos
Soluções para Diálise/uso terapêutico , Hemodiafiltração/métodos , Diálise Renal/métodos , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Soluções para Diálise/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
9.
Nefrología (Madrid) ; 38(6): 616-621, nov.-dic. 2018. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-178391

RESUMO

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: El abordaje multidisciplinar y el uso de ecografía doppler (ED) en la creación y vigilancia del acceso vascular (AV) puede mejorar la prevalencia y permeabilidad de las fístulas arteriovenosas (FAV) para hemodiálisis. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el impacto de una nueva consulta multidisciplinar (CMD) de AV con ED de rutina. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Evaluamos los resultados de la consulta de AV en 2014 (pre-CMD) y 2015 (CMD), antes y después de la implantación de un equipo multidisciplinar (cirujano vascular/nefrólogo) con ED de rutina en mapeo prequirúrgico y FAV prevalente. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 345 pacientes en 2014 (pre-CMD) y 364 pacientes en 2015 (CMD). En ambos periodos se realizó un número similar de cirugías, 172 vs. 198, p = 0,289, con tendencia a aumentar las cirugías preventivas de reparación de FAV en el periodo CMD, 17 vs. 29 (p = 0,098). En FAV de nueva creación (155 vs. 169), disminuyó la tasa de fallo primario en el periodo CMD, 26,4 vs. 15,3%, p = 0,015 y aumentó de forma no significativa la realización de FAV radiocefálicas distales, 25,8 vs. 33,2% (n = 40 vs. 56), p = 0,159. También aumentó la concordancia entre la indicación quirúrgica en la consulta y la cirugía realizada (81,3 vs. 93,5%, p = 0,001). En el periodo CMD se solicitaron menos exploraciones radiológicas desde la consulta, 78 vs. 35 (p < 0,001), con una reducción del gasto sanitario (81.716€ vs. 59.445€). CONCLUSIONES: El manejo multidisciplinar y la utilización del ED de rutina permiten mejorar los resultados de AV, con disminución de la tasa de fallo primario de FAV, más opciones de FAV distal nativa, mejor manejo de la FAV prevalente disfuncionante y menor coste en exploraciones radiológicas


BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF. RESULTS: We analysed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p = .289), with a trend towards an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p = .098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p = .015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n = 40 vs. 56), p = .159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p = .001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p < .001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€87,716 vs. €59,445). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs


Assuntos
Humanos , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodos , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Fístula Arteriovenosa/prevenção & controle , Diálise Renal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudo Observacional
10.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 38(6): 616-621, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29903522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF. RESULTS: We analysed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p=.289), with a trend towards an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p=.098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p=.015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n=40 vs. 56), p=.159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p=.001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p <.001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€87,716 vs. €59,445). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs.


Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Vasos Sanguíneos/diagnóstico por imagem , Diálise Renal/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Humanos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...